On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:06, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -1. We need to fix this, not drop. > > The feature is already very poor, hard to understand and configure, and > again, I don’t know anyone who is using this. “Fixing” this would, imho, > mean, starting from scratch and making this properly, just restoring the > half-baked 1.x state is not very pretty. > > That said, are you volunteering? :)
Seems like there are no much options. I disagree that it's very poor. The only flaws it has is the lack of RSA support (our implementation) and open security issues (as auth protocol). But is there any good alternative? -- ,,,^..^,,,
