I'm a big fan of Elixir, and it's growing community. I believe that more Elixir adoption in the CouchDB project would make it more approachable, and would benefit greatly from a community of developers that's sure to dwarf the traditional Erlang developer ecosystem.
--Nick On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Ilya Khlopotov <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I would love to do it with elixir. > It would be easier, faster to implement and it would have less number of > bugs (since it is possible to do some checks at compile time). > But it would be a dumb move if there is no 100% buy in from all active > contributors and stake holders. > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Alexander Shorin ---2015/10/01 03:36:32 > PM---On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Ilya Khlopotov <iilyak@c]Alexander > Shorin ---2015/10/01 03:36:32 PM---On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Ilya > Khlopotov <[email protected]> wrote: > None of them perfect tho > > From: Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: 2015/10/01 03:36 PM > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Improve testing infrastructure of couchdb > ------------------------------ > > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Ilya Khlopotov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > None of them perfect though. Even though going with elixir would provide > > technological advantage. It would impose a steep learning curve on > > developers. > > > Sure. But I think it doesn't really matter what to learn: a new popular > language or a new specific framework. Both solutions will force to learn > something new, but elixir has much more bigger potential here. > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > >
