* Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
* Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
* All sigs are ok
* configure ok
* make check:
ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
ERROR: eunit failed while processing
/private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is this:
module 'chttpd_view_test'
chttpd view tests
chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
chttpd_view_test:91:
should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
chttpd_view_test:108:
should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
Is this critical
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk <andr...@family-wenk.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>>>
>>> sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
>>> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
>>> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>>
>>
>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>>
>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>
> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and not
> using —check it is fixed.
>
> Thanks Jan!
>
> All the best
>
> Andy
>
>>
>> Best
>> Jan
>> —
>>
>>> I installed coreutils vi brew
>>>
>>> Andy ideo on this?
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Andy
>>> --
>>> Andy Wenk
>>> Hamburg
>>>
>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 10000)
>>>>
>>>> Checksums and sig match
>>>> make check passes cleanly
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
>>>>>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as
>>>>>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As
>>>>>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one
>>>>>> day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24
>>>>>> hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org
>>>>>> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going
>>>>>> - Push binary packages to bintray.org
>>>>>> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR
>>>>>> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website
>>>>>> - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.)
>>>>>> - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>> None.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> —
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave.
>>>>>>>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Candidate release notes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>>>>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>>>>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig
>>>>>>>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on
>>>>>>>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be
>>>>>>>> made.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512
>>>>>>>> checksums.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these
>>>>>>>> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
>>>>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
