* Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
* Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]

* All sigs are ok
* configure ok
* make check:

ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
ERROR: eunit failed while processing 
/private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2 

Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is this:

module 'chttpd_view_test'
  chttpd view tests
    chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
in function 
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1 
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
  output:<<"">>

    chttpd_view_test:91: 
should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
in function 
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1 
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
  output:<<"">>

    chttpd_view_test:108: 
should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
in function 
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1 
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
  output:<<"">>

Is this critical




> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk <andr...@family-wenk.de> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk <andyw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>>> 
>>>     sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
>>>     sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly 
>>> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>> 
>> 
>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option 
>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>> 
>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
> 
> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted 
> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and not 
> using —check it is fixed.
> 
> Thanks Jan!
> 
> All the best
> 
> Andy
> 
>> 
>> Best
>> Jan
>> —
>> 
>>> I installed coreutils vi brew
>>> 
>>> Andy ideo on this?
>>> 
>>> All the best
>>> 
>>> Andy
>>> --
>>> Andy Wenk
>>> Hamburg 
>>> 
>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55  21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 10000)
>>>> 
>>>> Checksums and sig match
>>>> make check passes cleanly
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be 
>>>>>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as 
>>>>>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As 
>>>>>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one 
>>>>>> day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 
>>>>>> hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org
>>>>>>      - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going
>>>>>>      - Push binary packages to bintray.org
>>>>>>      - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR
>>>>>>      - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website
>>>>>>      - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.)
>>>>>>      - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any objections?
>>>>> 
>>>>> None.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best
>>>>> Jan
>>>>> —
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave.
>>>>>>>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Dear community,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Candidate release notes:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release 
>>>>>>>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the 
>>>>>>>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig 
>>>>>>>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on 
>>>>>>>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be 
>>>>>>>> made.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 
>>>>>>>> checksums.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please follow the test procedure here:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these 
>>>>>>>> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
>>>>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/

Reply via email to