On 2020-02-14 5:49 p.m., Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, at 20:13, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
Please cast your votes now.
+1
- FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64
- SM185 & SM60
- OTP 22.2.6
also a very excited double-plus-one for ... drumroll ...
FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 / armv8 <---- awoooo
- SM60 with very latest patches 60.9.0_1
- OTP 21.3.8.11
Finished in 58.4 seconds
301 tests, 0 failures, 24 excluded
Randomized with seed 566866
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0'
root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # uname -a
FreeBSD a01 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r357847: Thu Feb 13 04:15:31
UTC 2020
r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64
root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 #
I've left both of these running in a loop, but so far I've had over an hour
without any issue. Very very excited.
Thanks Dave, that confirms my suspicions, that the packages in CentOS
and Debian are just a bit too far behind the tip of 60esr. If you can
isolate the problem to a very specific patch, we can both push that
patch to the Linux distros as well as update our release notes / build
guidance. With new distro packages we could even rebuild our releases to
use those builds. That is, if you have the time ;)
-Joan
