I think I'm not qualified enough to write down a technical commentary, so
the only thing I can do is congrat with Jan :-D

Alessio

Il ven 21 ago 2020, 20:08 Joan Touzet <woh...@apache.org> ha scritto:

> Comments, in no particular order:
>
> * I like that it's opt-in on a per-database level to create and maintain
>    the additional indexes.
>
> * I like that this is an MVP for the feature, one that will get more
>    advanced over time.
>
> * I guess we are putting off using maps (vs. records) until 4.x at the
>    earlier?
>
> * There's a whole lot of feedback on the RFC from the IBM core team that
>    needs to get addressed before that can be merged. Most of it is
>    structural, such as Garren's comments, but there are some questions
>    from Mike Rhodes to which I haven't seen Jan reply yet. I don't know
>    if the PR addresses those or not.
>
> * Obviously Jan needs help on point 9, which I'll start investigating
>    later today (after mid-day errands)
>
> * If this is intended to replace db-per-user, we should immediately
>    file the deprecation notice on that and prepare to remove it entirely
>    in 4.x.
>
> Great to see this move forward!
>
> -Joan "goin' to the bank like an adult" Touzet
>
> On 21/08/2020 08:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > Hi all, I‘d like to once again solicit feedback from the core team about
> my PR for per doc access control.
> >
> > I know we all have a lot to do, but it’d be great to get some pointers
> on this, so I can gauge how much work it‘ll be to take over the finish line.
> >
> > If it helps any, I‘d be happy to set up a video call to walk folks
> through the main parts.
> >
> > I understand that a lot of Cloudant folks are focused on 4.x, but when
> we last talked, we deemed this feature important enough for 3.x, so I built
> that first. The experience from building this suggests to me that’s 4.x
> port should be fairly straightforward, and that that port should even make
> it easy to add the much desired addition of group sharing.
> >
> > I’m equally happy to take silence as approval, in which case all I ask
> for is a thumbs up, at which point, I‘ll plow through the remaining todos
> and get this out asap.
> >
> > Best
> > Jan
> > —
> >
> >> On 3. Aug 2020, at 17:29, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> *bump* Hey all, it’d be great to get at least some cursory feedback on
> this.
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Jan
> >> —
> >>
> >>>>> On 26. Jul 2020, at 20:28, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Hey all,
> >>> I’m happy to present the first PR worth sharing for introducing
> per-doc-access control to the 3.x codebase.
> >>> https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/3038
> >>> There are few odds and ends left to do, but this is in good enough
> shape to get wider review on approach and implementation so far.
> >>> My hope would be to include this in a future 3.2.0 release before
> embarking on reimplementing this for 4.x, which should be considerably
> simpler.
> >>> The PR and linked resources have most of the information relevant to
> this.
> >>> Please review, test and critique heavily, and let me know any
> questions you might have.
> >>> This concludes a couple of weeks worth of effort spread across
> multiple years. It all started with the developer summit in Boston and
> Adam’s initial presentation of this design. I hope this makes it justice.
> >>> Best
> >>> Jan
> >>> —
> >>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB:
> >>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
> >
>

Reply via email to