> On Feb 7, 2018, at 5:37 AM, bernard metzler <[email protected]> wrote: > > This CCLA - is that unrelated to the ICLA's and the CLA from > IBM, which we already have in place? Do we currently need more? > What is definitively missing are the CLA's from our laggards…
Sorry, I did not realize that IBM had filed the CLA. Then we’re good in that regard. Yes, please keep up the pressure on the laggards filing ICLAs. > Regarding the name search - We did it already internally a whole > while ago. Could one please help us getting up to speed with the > needed Apache procedure? Yes, I’ll help you. It is documented in the Podling Name Search Guide[1] but the essence is filling out a JIRA case[2]. I’ll get things rolling this week. > Definitely! We shall go for Montreal in September, and probably prepare > something for the June event in Berlin as well. Any help on getting > things acceptable and accepted would be highly appreciated! > > Btw. We forgot to add to the Report our rejected attempt to have a pitch > at the Berlin DataWorks Summit in April. Maybe we shall add that to > the next report, since the current is closing. Sorry to hear that DataWorks Summit rejected you; hope you have more luck with the other conferences. Julian [1] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html <https://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-118 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-118>
