Thanks for the clarification. Let's wait until tomorrow to close the voting
for the PPMC.
Jonas
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:57:44 -0700
Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
The “binding” thing is a bit confusing. Let me attempt to clarify.
The first vote is in the PPMC (podling PMC) and members of the PPMC
have binding votes. That’s mentors plus initial committers - i.e.
most folks on this list.
The second vote is by the incubator PMC. It starts only when the
first vote has passed. Only members of the IPMC have binding votes.
That’s your mentors plus anyone else on the IPMC who takes an
interest in voting. Mentors’ votes cast during the first vote are
generally carried forward to the second vote.
So, we already have enough PPMC votes for the first vote to pass. We
need to make sure the 72 hour minimum duration has passed (to give
everyone opportunity to vote) before we close the vote. Then we
should start the vote in IPMC.
Julian
On Apr 26, 2018, at 3:27 AM, bernard metzler <bmetz...@gmx.ch>
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Jonas,
Many thanks for driving this release forward. Let's cross fingers
we get all the binding votes needed ;)
Luciano, Raphael - did you by any chance found the time to have
Crail RC2 evaluated..? Thanks very much for your support!
Cheers,
Bernard.
On 4/26/2018 9:47, Jonas Pfefferle wrote:
Hi Julian,
Thanks for the vote.
I will link the key into the web of trust thing and I just fixed the
KEYS file (The "HOWTO" part is a shameless copy of gearpump's KEYS
file).
So current vote status is:
+ 1 Binding vote by Julian Hyde
- 0
(+ 3 not binding)
Since we need another PMC meber to vote besides Julian and Luciano.
Has anyone heard from Raphael?
@Julian, Luciano is there any other PMC member you know we can ask
to vote for this release?
Thanks,
Jonas
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:02:14 -0700
Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
+1 (binding)
Downloaded, checked signatures and checksums. Checked LICENSE,
NOTICE, README.md, KEYS, headers, ran RAT. Built using JDK 8 on
MacOS.
One thing: The key is not linked into a web of trust[1]. It doesn’t
have to happen before the release, and won’t alter the artifacts for
this release, but let’s do it soon.
Another minor thing: KEYS[2] mentions Gearpump at one point. I think
you meant Crail! (The gpg “HOWTO” at the top of KEYS is most welcome.
Thanks for that!)
Julian
[1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#link-into-wot
<https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#link-into-wot>
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS>
On Apr 23, 2018, at 4:40 AM, Jonas Pfefferle <peppe...@japf.ch>
wrote:
Hi all,
I fixed all the comments from rc1 and created rc2:
* Add all three source download options in README (@Julian
requirements were already there)
* Fix NOTICE file to include actual year for Apache Software
Foundation
* Fix signatures
* Created KEYS file
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/crail/KEYS
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/master/HISTORY.md
The commit to be voted upon:
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=749f44206943fcaef0841ed89411013c2dc11d64
Its hash is 749f44206943fcaef0841ed89411013c2dc11d64.
The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.0-rc2/
The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
source.tar.gz.sha256
6900341d8d8347be71107fe8c766358b587d96a3e505cd501f6d0d8690a3f3c7
source.zip.sha256
51c2b11658e70ef0b7a80c427d88ee1a928fae8499f3910fe9bcc89a6fcfa5e3
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pepperjo.asc
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.0
incubating.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
at least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.0 incubating
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Here is my vote:
+1
Jonas
