Hi Jonas - thanks for preparing the release. I checked

- checked checksum for the source and binary tar.gz - OK
- checked signature for the source and binary tar.gz - OK
- checked DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files in the source and binary
tar.gz - OK
- build from the source release - OK
- compared git source tag with the source tar.gz - OK

+1 from my side.

Cheers,
--
Animesh


On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:37 PM Jonas Pfefferle <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> We prepared a new release to address the issues found in rc3. This is a
> call
> for a vote on releasing Apache Crail 1.1-incubating, release candidate 4.
> The following issues has been addressed:
>
> * Append filename in checksum files to allow checking checksums with
> "sha512sum -c"
> * Add instruction to README to generate/access documentation locally from
> source
> * Add LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER file to binary tarball and jars
> META-INF
> * Add top level directory to binary tarball
> * Minor fixes in the documentation
>
> The source and binary tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/crail/1.1-rc4/
>
> The commit to be voted upon:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=commit;h=f34314a49a0ca795d163988e56778641ca2c7a1d
>
> The Nexus Staging URL:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecrail-1003/
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the key AA557B11:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/crail/KEYS
>
> For information about the contents of this release, see:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-crail.git;a=blob_plain;f=HISTORY.md;hb=f34314a49a0ca795d163988e56778641ca2c7a1d
> or for better readability
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/blob/v1.1-rc4/HISTORY.md
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Crail 1.1-incubating
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Jonas
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to