[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13713377#comment-13713377
]
Gabriel Reid commented on CRUNCH-240:
-------------------------------------
Yep, definitely seems fine to me.
The reason I made it package private (I think ) is because I assumed it was no
longer needed, with the specific join types (inner, outer, etc) being covered
by the different JoinTypes. Just out of curiosity, could you share a bit about
the join types that you're doing?
> Make DefaultJoinStrategy.join(PTable, PTable, JoinFn) public
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRUNCH-240
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-240
> Project: Crunch
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Josh Wills
> Attachments: CRUNCH-240.patch
>
>
> The API refactoring made the default join implementation that allowed clients
> to specify custom JoinFn implementations package protected instead of public.
> This patch makes it public again so that existing custom JoinFn impls will
> still work on Crunch 0.7.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira