[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13713377#comment-13713377
 ] 

Gabriel Reid commented on CRUNCH-240:
-------------------------------------

Yep, definitely seems fine to me.

The reason I made it package private (I think ) is because I assumed it was no 
longer needed, with the specific join types (inner, outer, etc) being covered 
by the different JoinTypes. Just out of curiosity, could you share a bit about 
the join types that you're doing? 
                
> Make DefaultJoinStrategy.join(PTable, PTable, JoinFn) public
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CRUNCH-240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRUNCH-240
>             Project: Crunch
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Josh Wills
>         Attachments: CRUNCH-240.patch
>
>
> The API refactoring made the default join implementation that allowed clients 
> to specify custom JoinFn implementations package protected instead of public. 
> This patch makes it public again so that existing custom JoinFn impls will 
> still work on Crunch 0.7.0.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to