Thanks. This has been done in trunk now since r. 1465043 [For those who need the previous version, we can create a branch from the previous revision if really required.] (There were some logical changes as we sat down and worked on it together with Jinho the other day.) Feel free to give it a try.
--Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Becker [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: cTAKES Dependency Parser / SRL updates > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Chen, Pei > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I am planning to update the existing ctakes-dependency-parser > > ClearParser (which is no longer supported) implementation with Jinho's > > new ClearNLP parser and SRL. The models have been retrained with more > > data (MiPaq and > > SHARP) and much improved (1/4 memory footprint and faster). Note that > > the current default pipeline actually has the SRL component commented > out. > > > > I am planning to replace the existing code in trunk. Please let me > > know if you have any objections or if you need the existing dependency > > parser code for some reason. Otherwise, I would like to avoid > > supporting a dependency on a lib that is no longer supported with the > same functionality. > > > > Hi Pei, > > If you need an example of how to prepare the data to go into ClearNLP and > how to take it back out, you can look at how ClearTK wraps ClearNLP. > > This is the code currently in the master branch of ClearTK. Because it only > operates on the ClearTK typesystem it may be easier to read. > https://code.google.com/p/cleartk/source/browse/#git%2Fcleartk- > clearnlp%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcleartk%2Fclearnlp > > This is the code in the branch for issue-359 that is aiming to make the > wrappers more generic so that people can use their own type system, like > say cTAKES tokens and relationships. These APIs are a work in progress, but > they might provide a useful path since cTAKES already depends on ClearTK in > parts, this might be a faster path as all you would need to do would be to > implement your own version of TokenOps, DependencyOps, and SrlOps, and > then you would create new classes that extend *_ImplBase. I would be > curious to know if they are currently general enough to support a type > system like the one in cTAKES. > https://code.google.com/p/cleartk/source/browse/?name=issue- > 359#git%2Fcleartk- > clearnlp%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcleartk%2Fclearnlp > > Let me know if you have any questions, > Lee
