Excellent news, Thanks Pei (and Jinho) -----Original Message----- From: Chen, Pei [mailto:pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 1:04 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: RE: cTAKES Dependency Parser / SRL updates
Thanks. This has been done in trunk now since r. 1465043 [For those who need the previous version, we can create a branch from the previous revision if really required.] (There were some logical changes as we sat down and worked on it together with Jinho the other day.) Feel free to give it a try. --Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Becker [mailto:lee.bec...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:59 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: cTAKES Dependency Parser / SRL updates > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Chen, Pei > <pei.c...@childrens.harvard.edu>wrote: > > > I am planning to update the existing ctakes-dependency-parser > > ClearParser (which is no longer supported) implementation with > > Jinho's new ClearNLP parser and SRL. The models have been retrained > > with more data (MiPaq and > > SHARP) and much improved (1/4 memory footprint and faster). Note > > that the current default pipeline actually has the SRL component > > commented > out. > > > > I am planning to replace the existing code in trunk. Please let me > > know if you have any objections or if you need the existing > > dependency parser code for some reason. Otherwise, I would like to > > avoid supporting a dependency on a lib that is no longer supported > > with the > same functionality. > > > > Hi Pei, > > If you need an example of how to prepare the data to go into ClearNLP > and how to take it back out, you can look at how ClearTK wraps ClearNLP. > > This is the code currently in the master branch of ClearTK. Because it > only operates on the ClearTK typesystem it may be easier to read. > https://code.google.com/p/cleartk/source/browse/#git%2Fcleartk- > clearnlp%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcleartk%2Fclearnlp > > This is the code in the branch for issue-359 that is aiming to make > the wrappers more generic so that people can use their own type > system, like say cTAKES tokens and relationships. These APIs are a > work in progress, but they might provide a useful path since cTAKES > already depends on ClearTK in parts, this might be a faster path as > all you would need to do would be to implement your own version of > TokenOps, DependencyOps, and SrlOps, and then you would create new > classes that extend *_ImplBase. I would be curious to know if they > are currently general enough to support a type system like the one in cTAKES. > https://code.google.com/p/cleartk/source/browse/?name=issue- > 359#git%2Fcleartk- > clearnlp%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fcleartk%2Fclearnlp > > Let me know if you have any questions, Lee
