I will hold off the build. I looked again at CTAKES-190, and after doing a search on the code in trunk for "MedicationEventMention" I still see places outside of relation extractor where it is being used (instead of the newer MedicationMention).
I'll update those places, probably tomorrow. Also, Steve, when you get a chance, if you could look at what I wrote in CTAKES-190 on May 06, and handle or let me know what pieces still need to be looked at in the relation extractor, that would be great. I'll post again when I have a next target date for a build. Meanwhile anyone else who has input related to the timing of the build, please don't hesitate to post. -- James -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Bethard Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? On 26 Jun2013, at 8:35 , "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > I had originally suggested today, June 26, as the start of the cTAKES 3.1 > build. > > Now I am thinking of doing a build (my first) tomorrow, June 27. > Hopefully that will turn into RC1 of Apache cTAKES 3.1 > > Q1) Any reasons not to do that (any reason to delay a bit)? As far as I know, we still have not yet updated the relation extractor since the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1]. I will try to make some time for that this week, but I have several other commitments, so I'm not sure exactly when I'll be able to complete it. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-190 Steve > I will follow [1] and update that page if anything has changed > > I plan to create a branch in SVN and build from the branch. As [1] states, as > release manager I will be responsible for getting any fixes into the branch > (or perhaps just create a new branch depending on activity), so you can > continue to just work from trunk. > > A new version of the Wiki pages for the user and developer guides needs to be > created > Q2) Is there a faster way to duplicate a set of Wiki pages than copying them > one by one? > > [1] http://ctakes.apache.org/ctakes-release-guide.html > > > -- James > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Tim Miller > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? > > Yes I think it can be done by then. But even if not, my understanding is > that the version turned on by default is not cleartk-based and the > cleartk one is still under development. > Tim > > On 05/31/2013 03:25 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote: >> I'll be release manager for 3.1 (unless someone else is anxious to be and >> just hasn't seen this thread yet) >> >> I'd suggest we target Wed June 26 to have an RC built. >> >> Steve, would that seem reasonable for the relation extractor changes due to >> [1], plus those that would be needed if we upgrade ClearTK dependency to >> 1.4.0. >> >> Anyone know enough about assertion code to make an educated guess of whether >> the "upgrade ClearTK dependency to 1.4.0" could be done by then too? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Steven Bethard >> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:18 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >> >> As a result of the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1], the >> relation extractor needs some refactoring and retraining. Probably we won't >> have a chance to get to that until after NAACL (June 9-15). So it would be >> best for us to target the 3.1 release towards the end of June. >> >> Steve >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-190 >> >> On May 31, 2013, at 1:01 PM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES/fixforversion/12323276#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel >>> 25/58 are either closed/resolved; there were a decent number of simple >>> patch fixes I think. >>> >>> To spread the knowledge, perhaps another committer could be the release >>> manager (RM) for the next release. Hint hint *James? ;) >>> >>> --Pei >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 4:41 PM >>>> To: '[email protected]' >>>> Subject: RE: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >>>> >>>> >>>> The new CEM Instance Template population is not complete yet, but if 3.1 is >>>> late May or June, it will be. >>>> >>>> Also, is the GUI close enough to being ready for prime time that it would >>>> have a chance to be in 3.1? >>>> >>>> -- James >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>> [mailto:dev- [email protected]] >>>> On >>>>> Behalf Of Chen, Pei >>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:56 PM >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> I just wanted to gauge the interest of creating the next release of >>>>> cTAKES >>>>> (3.1) which is currently marked for May in Jira- >>>>> >>>>> There have already been 22/53 issues [1] marked as fixed or closed. >>>>> Plenty of bug fixes and new components including: >>>>> - New CEM Instance Template population >>>>> - New Dependency Parser/Semantic Role Labeler >>>>> - New optional Clear POSTagger >>>>> - New regression testing component >>>>> >>>>> Should we wait for the Temporal component? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1%2 >>>>> 2%20 >>>>> AND%20project%20%3D%20CTAKES >
