On 26 Jun2013, at 10:51 , "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > I will hold off the build.
Ok, I think relation-extractor should be good to go now. Steve > > I looked again at CTAKES-190, and after doing a search on the code in trunk > for "MedicationEventMention" I still see places outside of relation extractor > where it is being used (instead of the newer MedicationMention). > > I'll update those places, probably tomorrow. > > Also, Steve, when you get a chance, if you could look at what I wrote in > CTAKES-190 on May 06, and handle or let me know what pieces still need to be > looked at in the relation extractor, that would be great. > > I'll post again when I have a next target date for a build. Meanwhile anyone > else who has input related to the timing of the build, please don't hesitate > to post. > > -- James > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Steven Bethard > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? > > On 26 Jun2013, at 8:35 , "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: >> I had originally suggested today, June 26, as the start of the cTAKES 3.1 >> build. >> >> Now I am thinking of doing a build (my first) tomorrow, June 27. >> Hopefully that will turn into RC1 of Apache cTAKES 3.1 >> >> Q1) Any reasons not to do that (any reason to delay a bit)? > > As far as I know, we still have not yet updated the relation extractor since > the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1]. I will try to make some > time for that this week, but I have several other commitments, so I'm not > sure exactly when I'll be able to complete it. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-190 > > Steve > >> I will follow [1] and update that page if anything has changed >> >> I plan to create a branch in SVN and build from the branch. As [1] states, >> as release manager I will be responsible for getting any fixes into the >> branch (or perhaps just create a new branch depending on activity), so you >> can continue to just work from trunk. >> >> A new version of the Wiki pages for the user and developer guides needs to >> be created >> Q2) Is there a faster way to duplicate a set of Wiki pages than copying them >> one by one? >> >> [1] http://ctakes.apache.org/ctakes-release-guide.html >> >> >> -- James >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >> Of Tim Miller >> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:27 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >> >> Yes I think it can be done by then. But even if not, my understanding is >> that the version turned on by default is not cleartk-based and the >> cleartk one is still under development. >> Tim >> >> On 05/31/2013 03:25 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote: >>> I'll be release manager for 3.1 (unless someone else is anxious to be and >>> just hasn't seen this thread yet) >>> >>> I'd suggest we target Wed June 26 to have an RC built. >>> >>> Steve, would that seem reasonable for the relation extractor changes due to >>> [1], plus those that would be needed if we upgrade ClearTK dependency to >>> 1.4.0. >>> >>> Anyone know enough about assertion code to make an educated guess of >>> whether the "upgrade ClearTK dependency to 1.4.0" could be done by then too? >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >>> Of Steven Bethard >>> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:18 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >>> >>> As a result of the CTAKES-190 changes to the dictionary lookup [1], the >>> relation extractor needs some refactoring and retraining. Probably we won't >>> have a chance to get to that until after NAACL (June 9-15). So it would be >>> best for us to target the 3.1 release towards the end of June. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-190 >>> >>> On May 31, 2013, at 1:01 PM, "Chen, Pei" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES/fixforversion/12323276#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aversion-issues-panel >>>> 25/58 are either closed/resolved; there were a decent number of simple >>>> patch fixes I think. >>>> >>>> To spread the knowledge, perhaps another committer could be the release >>>> manager (RM) for the next release. Hint hint *James? ;) >>>> >>>> --Pei >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Masanz, James J. [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 4:41 PM >>>>> To: '[email protected]' >>>>> Subject: RE: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The new CEM Instance Template population is not complete yet, but if 3.1 >>>>> is >>>>> late May or June, it will be. >>>>> >>>>> Also, is the GUI close enough to being ready for prime time that it would >>>>> have a chance to be in 3.1? >>>>> >>>>> -- James >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>> [mailto:dev- [email protected]] >>>>> On >>>>>> Behalf Of Chen, Pei >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 7:56 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Next cTAKES release (3.1)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I just wanted to gauge the interest of creating the next release of >>>>>> cTAKES >>>>>> (3.1) which is currently marked for May in Jira- >>>>>> >>>>>> There have already been 22/53 issues [1] marked as fixed or closed. >>>>>> Plenty of bug fixes and new components including: >>>>>> - New CEM Instance Template population >>>>>> - New Dependency Parser/Semantic Role Labeler >>>>>> - New optional Clear POSTagger >>>>>> - New regression testing component >>>>>> >>>>>> Should we wait for the Temporal component? >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] >>>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%223.1%2 >>>>>> 2%20 >>>>>> AND%20project%20%3D%20CTAKES >> >
