Hi all, Thank you so much for your reply. Yes I was trying to start it faster when I run it repeatedly. Your emails help me a lot. I really appreciate it. Thanks.
Best, Pan On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Pan Teng <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you so much for your reply. Yes I was trying to start it faster when > I run it repeatedly. Your emails help me a lot. I really appreciate it. > Thanks. > > Best, > Pan > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Masanz, James J. > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Hi Pan, >> >> Is your interest in a command line because you are unable to open a GUI >> on your display, or is it for other reason, such as able to start it faster >> when you run repeatedly? Understanding why you are asking for a command >> line interface might help us make sure we address the root of the question. >> >> There is a class that will run one of the pipelines from the command line >> without a gui and put the xml output into a directory. However you need to >> have a classpath set properly. To accomplish that, you could try copying >> runctakesCPE.bat or runctakesCPE.sh >> and within the script file, replacing >> org.apache.uima.tools.cpm.CpmFrame >> with >> org.apache.ctakes.clinicalpipeline.ClinicalPipelineWithUmls >> >> For now that might be a start. >> >> >> All, >> I don't think the class I mentioned above is documented anywhere other >> than some brief comments at the start of the class. Maybe it could be a >> start of something simple that is command line driven until we get >> something with groovy written. Otherwise if a simpler interface (GUI) is >> needed than the UIMA-provided CPE/CVD GUIs (rather than strictly command >> line), perhaps our own GUI with some defaults would do a better job address >> new users. >> >> -- James >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Miller, Timothy >> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:56 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: cTAKES user interface >> >> Thanks William and Richard, those are both really excellent pointers. >> Tim >> >> On 10/29/2013 07:58 PM, William Karl Thompson wrote: >> > Nice! >> > >> > +1 for Groovy. It's like being able to program in Python again. >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Richard Eckart de Castilho [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:49 PM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: cTAKES user interface >> > >> > Maven allows to do marvelous things on the CLI, provided you throw in >> an additional component: Groovy. >> > >> > We did some amazing self-contained Groovy scripts with uimaFIT and >> DKPro Core which you might find interesting >> > >> > http://code.google.com/p/dkpro-core-asl/wiki/DKProGroovyCookbook >> > >> > -- Richard >> > >> > On 29.10.2013, at 23:09, "Miller, Timothy" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I think this is also an area where Maven integration was a small step >> backwards (I greatly appreciate the steps forward it allowed). I used to >> run stuff from the command line and in scripts more often but it's slightly >> less straightforward setting up the classpath with maven -- before you >> could put a simple java -cp lib/*.jar <class name> in a script, now I'm not >> sure how to go about it using maven. I'm sure there's a way, but I am >> afraid of falling down the maven rabbit hole. >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 29, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Chen, Pei wrote: >> >> >> >>> +1 >> >>> Pan, the short answer is yes- it can be done in CLI. >> >>> The problem is that most of us who are already familiar with the >> nitty gritty are probably doing this with some sort of custom scripts or >> solution. >> >>> Cc' the dev group to get a fresh perspective; not sure what the >> easiest would be-- run the CPE via command line with default input/output >> directories or running a Driver Main Class as part of examples. >> >>> >> >>> --Pei >> > >> >> >
