Thank you so much for your help. Harpreet.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Harpreet, > > If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast > module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module has > a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different methods > for lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster than the > default module (hence the name). Accuracy depends upon the parameter > settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable or > better. The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default > dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a hsql > in-memory version. Using the in-memory version makes dictionary lookup > practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second). Limited documentation > is available in the module's doc/ directory. > > I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write if > you have any questions. > > Sean > ________________________________________ > From: Harpreet Khanduja [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014 > > Hello, > I would be grateful if someone could help. > > I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed vocabulary. > I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look up > time. > But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve the > dictionary look up time? > > Thank you, > Harpreet >
