Hello, I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN.
Thank you On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <[email protected]> wrote: > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out > 3.1.1 from SVN. > If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from > the tag for 3.1.1. > > -- James > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014 > > Hello, > I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations to > the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use > ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast. > Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my > customizations getting removed? > > It would be a great help. > > Thank you, > > Harpreet > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thank you so much for your help. > > > > Harpreet. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Harpreet, > >> > >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast > >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup. That module > has > >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different > methods > >> for lookup and matching. In time trials it has been faster than the > >> default module (hence the name). Accuracy depends upon the parameter > >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable > or > >> better. The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default > >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a hsql > >> in-memory version. Using the in-memory version makes dictionary lookup > >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second). Limited > documentation > >> is available in the module's doc/ directory. > >> > >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write if > >> you have any questions. > >> > >> Sean > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [[email protected]] > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014 > >> > >> Hello, > >> I would be grateful if someone could help. > >> > >> I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed > vocabulary. > >> I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look > up > >> time. > >> But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve the > >> dictionary look up time? > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Harpreet > >> > > > > >
