Fine by me, thanks Jordan. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < [email protected]> wrote:
> There’s “demand” so I’ll start it now - barring any objections. > > -JZ > > > > On January 12, 2015 at 9:29:55 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( > [email protected]) wrote: > > I can do it next week if we can wait until then, I'm away from home until > next week so I'm a bit limited in what I can do. > cheers > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Anyone else want to do the release? Otherwise, I can start it. >> >> -Jordan >> >> >> >> On January 12, 2015 at 7:07:31 PM, Cameron McKenzie ( >> [email protected]) wrote: >> >> I agree that this should be a 2.7.1 release. >> >> Cool tool Mike, would it be easy to create a maven task to run it? >> >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Wow - that’s a cool tool. I didn’t know about it. The constructor change >> > won’t affect any clients as it’s not meant to be used directly. >> > >> > >> > >> > On January 12, 2015 at 6:48:32 PM, Mike Drob ([email protected]) >> wrote: >> > >> > I ran the japi-compatability-checker tool[1] to verify, and this was the >> > only issue that it found[2]. I think that's enough to push us into a >> minor >> > release over a bugfix according to SemVer rule #7, but I'm not 100% >> sure. >> > >> > [1]: http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/Java_API_Compliance_Checker >> > [2]: http://people.apache.org/~mdrob/curator-2.7.1/compat_report.html >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I think we have a good set of fixes for 2.7.1. Thoughts? Also, I don’t >> > > think these merit 2.8.0. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12328938 >> > > >> > > -Jordan >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >
