[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14505817#comment-14505817
]
Mike Drob commented on CURATOR-164:
-----------------------------------
Your version is still susceptible to incorrect sequencing:
T2: unregister()
T1: stateChanged()
T1: reRegisterServices()
T1: if ( service.state.get() == State.REGISTERED )
T1: internalRegisterService(service.service.get());
T2: internalUnregisterService()
T2: client.delete()
T1: client.create()
> curator-x-discovery: unregisterService is not guaranteed to remove the
> service, due to reconnectListener concurrency issue
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-164
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-164
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.7.0
> Reporter: Rasmus Berg Palm
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> In ServiceDiscoveryImpl:
> When unregistering a service, the reconnect listener might fire while
> deleting the path.
> This can cause a condition where the delete finishes successfully, the
> service is removed from services, and then the reRegisterServices completes
> successfully and the service is added back in ZK and in services, end result
> being that the service was not removed, even though unregisterService did not
> throw any exceptions.
> Essentially the use of the internal 'services' cache makes for a nightmare of
> concurrency issues. I put this as critical as the library it's really not
> usable IMO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
