Any reason why +0? Do you have some concerns? -JZ
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:40 AM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > > +0 no opinion, binding > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Bump, can some other committers please cast a vote. >> cheers >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> signature is valid. >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.9.1 >>>> >>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours >>>> >>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are >>>> provided for convenience. >>>> >>>> Link to release notes: >>>> * >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 >>>> < >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 >>>> * >>>> >>>> Staging repo: >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.1/ >>>> >>>> Binary artifacts: >>>> * >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ >>>> < >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ >>>> * >>>> >>>> The tag to be voted upon: >>>> * >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 >>>> < >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 >>>> * >>>> >>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>
