Ah rightyo, didn't realise that my vote counted towards the 3. I will release shortly. cheers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < [email protected]> wrote: > We have 3. Me, You and Mike. The vote passes. > > -Jordan > > > On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:24 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Currently we have: > > > > 2 +1 binding > > 1 +1 non-binding > > 1 +0 binding > > > > If any other comitters could vote that would be greatly appreciated. > > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Cameron McKenzie < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> hey Mike, > >> No built on Ubuntu, not sure why the zip file permissions are like that. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:17 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> Verified signatures and checksums. > >>> Verified compatibility with 2.9.0 release. > >>> > >>> Contents of zip file have 777 permissions, which probably isn't a huge > >>> issue but is mildly annoying/surprising. Cam, are you building on > Windows, > >>> by chance? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> No. We need 3 +1s for a vote to succeed. > >>>> > >>>>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Oh sorry, I thought by voting +0 I was helping form the quorum. :( > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>>>> In that case maybe you can reconsider and give a +1? We’re having > >>>> trouble getting quorum votes these days. > >>>>> > >>>>> -JZ > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No concerns! Just slammed right now with work so I'm not able to > >>>> really evaluate. I trust you all. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 29, 2015 8:42 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" < > >>> [email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>> Any reason why +0? Do you have some concerns? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -JZ > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:40 AM, Scott Blum <[email protected] > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> +0 no opinion, binding > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Cameron McKenzie < > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Bump, can some other committers please cast a vote. > >>>>>>>> cheers > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > >>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> signature is valid. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 binding > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Cameron McKenzie < > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.9.1 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are > >>>>>>>>>> provided for convenience. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Link to release notes: > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333324 > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: > >>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.1/ < > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.9.1/> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Binary artifacts: > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ > >>>> < > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ > >>>> < > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1019/ > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted upon: > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 > >>>> < > >>>> > >>> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=9ba74139e35fd6213e480d826a7de812e6b109b8 > >>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the > >>> release: > >>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS < > >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
