I’ll make the change.
> On Jan 18, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (Be happy to patch it myself, but I'm not sure what branch to commit to)
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> We should document that TreeCacheSelector implementations need to return
> stable answers over time. A Selector that returns different answers over
> time is specifically not supported, and will yield very inconsistent results.
> (This is why I didn't originally try to tackle this, but on the net I think
> it's fine.)
>
>
