I have no way of knowing. But, this is 4.0 after all - a major version bump. 
So, backward compatibility is less important. I'll cancel the release, post a 
PR with the change and let's see if there are objections.

-Jordan

> On Jul 23, 2017, at 11:46 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I think that approach is probably reasonable, but it would be nice to know
> if anyone is actually using the classic handling.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if we shouldn't just deprecate "classic" connection handling
>> since we're going to 4.0 anyway. It would certainly make the tests faster
>> and I can't imagine anyone is using it. But who knows. Thoughts?
>> 
>> -Jordan
>> 
>>> On Jul 23, 2017, at 8:26 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The TestTreeCache tests seem to be failing consistently for me
>>> 
>>> Specifically, the tests run OK but the teardown method is failing:
>>> 
>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Expected no events, found 2; first event:
>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=CONNECTION_LOST, data=null} expected [true] but
>> found
>>> [false]
>>> at org.testng.Assert.fail(Assert.java:94)
>>> at org.testng.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:496)
>>> at org.testng.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:42)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.BaseTestTreeCache.
>> assertNoMoreEvents(BaseTestTreeCache.java:143)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.BaseTestTreeCache.teardown(
>> BaseTestTreeCache.java:123)
>>> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>>> at
>>> org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(
>> MethodInvocationHelper.java:85)
>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurationMethod(
>> Invoker.java:515)
>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurations(Invoker.java:213)
>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:721)
>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:834)
>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1142)
>>> at
>>> org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(
>> TestMethodWorker.java:124)
>>> at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:108)
>>> at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:771)
>>> at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:621)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:357)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:352)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:310)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:259)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:52)
>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:86)
>>> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1176)
>>> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1101)
>>> at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1009)
>>> at org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.run(RemoteTestNG.java:111)
>>> at org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.initAndRun(RemoteTestNG.java:204)
>>> at org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG.main(RemoteTestNG.java:175)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 4.0.0 - candidate 2
>>>> 
>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>>> 
>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are provided
>> for
>>>> convenience.
>>>> 
>>>> Link to release notes:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>> ctId=12314425&version=12339847
>>>> 
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.0/
>>>> 
>>>> Binary artifacts:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachecurator-1041/
>>>> 
>>>> Stage Website:
>>>> http://curator.apache.org/private/staging/
>>>> 
>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;
>>>> h=dd153164948d3ebd5fa5506f2a5e47c24cf1e191
>>>> 
>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>>> 
>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to