What's the reason for +0 Scott?
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +0
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> All the tests are passing\
>> In 40 min for which is a huge difference.
>>
>>> (though the actual Maven task for the ZK3.4
>>> compatibility testing fails after all of the tests pass).
>>
>> Yeah = there's some weirdness with the way I'm copying in those files.
>> Let's make that a TBB.
>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 from me
>>>
>>> All the tests are passing (though the actual Maven task for the ZK3.4
>>> compatibility testing fails after all of the tests pass).
>>> Signatures are ok.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 4.0.0 - candidate 3
>>>>
>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>>>
>>>> http://datecountdown.com/?&d=7%2f29%2f2017+9%3a00+AM&t=
>>>> Apache+Curator+4.0.0+Release
>>>>
>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are provided
>> for
>>>> convenience.
>>>>
>>>> Link to release notes:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>>> projectId=12314425&version=12339847
>>>>
>>>> Staging repo:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.0/
>>>>
>>>> Binary artifacts:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>> orgapachecurator-1042/
>>>>
>>>> Stage Website:
>>>> http://curator.apache.org/private/staging/
>>>>
>>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=
>>>> aba918d2e6f325e6f4077e173feee26e93876a23
>>>>
>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>
>>
