I just fired everything up and I see the same errors.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Fangmin Lv <[email protected]> wrote:

> Run the tests again, and see TestReconfiguration failed:
>
> Tests run: 15, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 2, Time elapsed: 67.822 sec
> <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.curator.framework.imps.TestReconfiguration
> testAdd(org.apache.curator.framework.imps.TestReconfiguration)  Time
> elapsed: 12.941 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$BadVersionException: KeeperErrorCode
> =
> BadVersion
> at
> org.apache.curator.framework.imps.TestReconfiguration.
> testAdd(TestReconfiguration.java:195)
>
> testAddAndRemove(org.apache.curator.framework.imps.TestReconfiguration)
>  Time elapsed: 12.884 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> org.apache.zookeeper.KeeperException$BadVersionException: KeeperErrorCode
> =
> BadVersion
> at
> org.apache.curator.framework.imps.TestReconfiguration.testAddAndRemove(
> TestReconfiguration.java:277)
>
> Anyone else has this issue or only me?
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Fangmin Lv <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Same here, all tests passed except the ZK3.4 compatibility testing shows
> > error.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like clirr-maven-plugin needs some configuration love as far as
> >> what is actually part of the Curator public SDK.
> >>
> >> [INFO] --- clirr-maven-plugin:2.8:check (default) @ curator-client ---
> >> [INFO] artifact org.apache.curator:curator-client: checking for updates
> >> from central
> >> [INFO] Comparing to version: 3.3.0
> >> [ERROR] 8001:
> >> org.apache.curator.connection.ClassicConnectionHandlingPolicy: Class
> >> org.apache.curator.connection.ClassicConnectionHandlingPolicy removed
> >> [ERROR] 8001: org.apache.curator.shaded.com.
> >> google.common.annotations.Beta:
> >> Class org.apache.curator.shaded.com.google.common.annotations.Beta
> >> removed
> >>
> >> Running tests now
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok. It's just hard to get the votes. Can I convince you to just clone
> >> and
> >> > do a mvn test? You can run it in the background.
> >> >
> >> > ====================
> >> > Jordan Zimmerman
> >> >
> >> > On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Same as always!  I don't have the bandwidth to actively monitor
> Curator,
> >> > test it myself, or try out a new version against a code base I work on
> >> that
> >> > uses it.  So I can't vouch for it, but I trust you guys.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> What's the reason for +0 Scott?
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Jul 27, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Scott Blum <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +0
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>> All the tests are passing\
> >> >> >> In 40 min for which is a huge difference.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> (though the actual Maven task for the ZK3.4
> >> >> >>> compatibility testing fails after all of the tests pass).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Yeah = there's some weirdness with the way I'm copying in those
> >> files.
> >> >> >> Let's make that a TBB.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On Jul 26, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
> >> [email protected]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> +1 from me
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> All the tests are passing (though the actual Maven task for the
> >> ZK3.4
> >> >> >>> compatibility testing fails after all of the tests pass).
> >> >> >>> Signatures are ok.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> >> [email protected]>
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> Hello,
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> This is the vote for Apache Curator version 4.0.0 - candidate 3
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> http://datecountdown.com/?&d=7%2f29%2f2017+9%3a00+AM&t=
> >> >> >>>> Apache+Curator+4.0.0+Release
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >> >> provided
> >> >> >> for
> >> >> >>>> convenience.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Link to release notes:
> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> >> >> >>>> projectId=12314425&version=12339847
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Staging repo:
> >> >> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/4.0.0/
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Binary artifacts:
> >> >> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> >> >> orgapachecurator-1042/
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Stage Website:
> >> >> >>>> http://curator.apache.org/private/staging/
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> The tag to be voted upon:
> >> >> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=
> >> >> >>>> aba918d2e6f325e6f4077e173feee26e93876a23
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> >> release:
> >> >> >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >> >> >>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> >> >>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to