It would be better if we can choose the version of the website. If so, for updating a released website we'd have a corresponding release-5.0 branch and commit the patch on it, releasing the website from that branch.
Otherwise if we keep a single branch as is, the update wouldn't be reflected until the next release. Best, tison. Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> 于2020年6月15日周一 下午1:59写道： > Hi Curators, > > > I am just following the guide to rebuild the website (just added my self to > the committers list) > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=84805591#ForCuratorCommitters-publish-website > > Currently master is 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT, so if I rebuild the website it will > display 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT as version. > > Do you have suggestions ? > Proposals: > 1) Build the website from 5.0.0 tag, but it won't list me as committer > 2) Bump master to 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT and build the website, but it will display > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT > 3) Fix versions on current master to 5.0.0 only locally, build the website, > throw away my local changes > > I think the best is 3) but I don't like it very much, it looks like an hack > > Best Regards > Enrico >
