If we omit the version info, it seems we choose a way the website shows a
sort of nightly(unstable) version, and only such version.

Best,
tison.


Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> 于2020年6月15日周一 下午4:05写道:

> Tison,
> The website is built using Apache Maven site plugin.
>
> Maybe we can just change the skin in a way that we are not displaying the
> version from which the website has been generated
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 15 giu 2020 alle ore 09:50 tison <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
>
> > It would be better if we can choose the version of the website.
> >
> > If so, for updating a released website we'd have a corresponding
> > release-5.0 branch and commit the patch on it, releasing the website from
> > that branch.
> >
> > Otherwise if we keep a single branch as is, the update wouldn't be
> > reflected until the next release.
> >
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> >
> > Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> 于2020年6月15日周一 下午1:59写道:
> >
> > > Hi Curators,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am just following the guide to rebuild the website (just added my
> self
> > to
> > > the committers list)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=84805591#ForCuratorCommitters-publish-website
> > >
> > > Currently master is 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT, so if I rebuild the website it will
> > > display 5.0.0-SNAPSHOT as version.
> > >
> > > Do you have suggestions ?
> > > Proposals:
> > > 1) Build the website from 5.0.0 tag, but it won't list me as committer
> > > 2) Bump master to 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT and build the website, but it will
> > display
> > > 5.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > 3) Fix versions on current master to 5.0.0 only locally, build the
> > website,
> > > throw away my local changes
> > >
> > > I think the best is 3) but I don't like it very much, it looks like an
> > hack
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > Enrico
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to