[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13674370#comment-13674370
 ] 

Ioannis Canellos commented on CURATOR-14:
-----------------------------------------

I had 2 kind of issues on the LockInternals:
i) I was unsure on when I should remove the watcher from the global map.
ii) I was unsure if its possibly that a watcher for the same path can be reused.

For (i) I thought that the most fitting place would be to remove the watcher, 
when it fired (and maybe when we release the lock?).
For (ii) I used the internal map. I am totally unsure about that.

So please share your thoughts/ideas about it.

Regarding the WatcherKey, do u see it as a way of wrapping 
Watcher/CuratorWatcher objects or you think that the recipes should directly 
use anonymous inner implementations of the WatcherKey?


                
> Memory leak in Curator watches
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CURATOR-14
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-14
>             Project: Apache Curator
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Recipes
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-incubating
>            Reporter: Brandon Beck
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: CURATOR-14-draft-2.patch, CURATOR-14-draft-3.patch, 
> CURATOR-14.patch, MemoryTest.java
>
>
> The JVM runs out of memory if you repetitively create a PathChildrenCache, 
> start it then immediately stop it.  It appears that the memory is taken up by 
> a watch that isn't ever cleaned up.  Curator attempts to do some pooling of 
> watches, but doesn't seem to use the path in the pooling.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to