[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13675110#comment-13675110
]
Ioannis Canellos commented on CURATOR-14:
-----------------------------------------
If we don't use a Pool of NamespaceWatcher how do we solve the problem of
reusing NamespaceWatchers? Isn't that the goal?
>From what I understand we can't reuse NamespaceWatcher instances that were
>mapped to annonymous inner Wathcer/CuratorWatcher if we create a new instance
>of the recipe, right?
> Memory leak in Curator watches
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: CURATOR-14
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-14
> Project: Apache Curator
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Recipes
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-incubating
> Reporter: Brandon Beck
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CURATOR-14-draft-2.patch, CURATOR-14-draft-3.patch,
> CURATOR-14.patch, MemoryTest.java
>
>
> The JVM runs out of memory if you repetitively create a PathChildrenCache,
> start it then immediately stop it. It appears that the memory is taken up by
> a watch that isn't ever cleaned up. Curator attempts to do some pooling of
> watches, but doesn't seem to use the path in the pooling.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
