Hi Glen,
I have already added a jira issue at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-909 about one year ago but had
lost the current state of the standardization out of sight.
The JMSConfiguration class I have already implemented in the JMS
transport could be our own style. To make it backwards compatible I have
already introduced the OldJmsConfigHolder. This is used to translate the
current config style into the new one. For the SOAP over JMS standard I
think we could add another translation. This way we are independent of
the standard and can style implement it.
What do you think?
Greetings
Christian
Glen Mazza schrieb:
Christian, I would take a look at the IBM document attached here:
http://www.nabble.com/SOAP-JMS-binding-tool-changes-td19073747.html
and the specification it links to:
http://www.w3.org/Submission/SOAPJMS/
I'm unsure of the relation to these documents to what you're proposing, nor
am I necessarily recommending we do what they do, but I'm mentioning this in
case there is something important in these documents that you might have
overlooked in your suggestions.
Glen
Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi,
after Glen´s Mail about my tutorial for setting up JMS for CXF with
Apache Camel on the dev list there was a discussion about improvements
for the JMS config for CXF.
I have written a proposal how I think this could be done. My focus is
only on the configuration syntax not the implementation but I think it
can be done.
Here is the link to the proposal. I would be very interested in your
opinions about this style of configuration:
http://www.liquid-reality.de/display/liquid/2008/08/30/Proposal+for+a+new+JMS+Transport+configuration+for+CXF
Best regards
Christian
--
Christian Schneider
---
http://www.liquid-reality.de
--
Christian Schneider
---
http://www.liquid-reality.de
