Hi Glen, I sent this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but copied [email protected] to keep the CXF community updated. Hope this makes sense...
David 2008/11/4 Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I don't know much about this, but this email seems better routed to the Felix > project--first get them to incorporate your work, and then come back to us. > Or would you like our support in getting the Felix project to accept your > code donation? > > Glen > > > David Bosschaert wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> In the context of the Apache CXF project a number of people have been >> involved in implementing the Distribution Software part of Distributed >> OSGi (RFC 119 [1]). >> >> For its functioning on the client side, Distributed OSGi depends on >> the OSGi Service Registry Hooks (RFC 126, also available in [1]). To >> keep us going we implemented certain bits of RFC 126 in a private copy >> of Felix in the CXF DOSGi buildsystem. However, we would like to use >> the real Felix, so we are interested in contributing our RFC 126 bits >> into Felix so we can use it straight from there. This is referenced in >> CXF bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1897 >> >> The CXF codebase doesnt contain all of RFC 126 - it only contains the >> ListenerHook, which is about a third of RFC 126, but it would provide >> a start... >> >> If Felix is interested in taking this implementation, it might make >> sense to create a bug in Felix JIRA so that this stuff can be attached >> as a patch to that once its ready to move into Felix. >> >> Thoughts anyone? >> >> Best regards, >> >> David >> >> [1] http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft.pdf >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Contributing-parts-of-the-ServiceRegistry-Hooks-%28RFC-126%29-implementation-into-Felix-tp20325861p20327352.html > Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
