Thanks Dan, should be sorted in this latest commit: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772302&view=rev
/Eoghan 2009/5/6 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: > > > Pretty close. Just mentioned on IRC that the source distro needs the > LICENSE/NOTICE things. Other than that, looks much better. > > Thanks! > Dan > > > On Wed May 6 2009 9:10:18 am Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: >> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said). >> > >> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the >> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to >> > the walkthroughs and such on the website. >> >> I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and >> pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/ >>main/release/README?view=markup >> >> I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev >> >> So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release. >> >> Cheers, >> Eoghan >> >> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: >> > OK. That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said). >> > >> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the >> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to >> > the walkthroughs and such on the website. >> > >> > Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say >> > "uhh..... what do I do with this?" We definitely need a readme in >> > there to describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site, >> > the users@ list for questions, etc..... >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote: >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> >> >> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can >> >> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi >> >> documentation is available here: >> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links >> >> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the >> >> greeter sample: >> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html >> >> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you >> >> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is >> >> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample >> >> artefacts in maven. >> >> >> >> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to >> >> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think >> >> this should hold up the release. >> >> >> >> Hope this makes sense to you, >> >> >> >> David >> >> >> >> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>: >> >> > I think I have to -1 this. Couple legal things need to get ironed >> >> > out: >> >> > >> >> > 1) Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that >> >> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf? I ASSUME the >> >> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure. Also, there needs to be a >> >> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the >> >> > tag. That would also go into dist. >> >> > >> >> > 2) I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed. For example: >> >> > DOSGi doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed. Not >> >> > major, but if a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up. >> >> > >> >> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at >> >> > least the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it. >> >> > See the LICENSE in the cxf distributions. (remote-resources can do >> >> > that, I may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my >> >> > backlog of email. :-( ) >> >> > >> >> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples, >> >> > possible a readme, etc...? Should there be? Not a big deal >> >> > either way, but a bit strange. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Dan >> >> > >> >> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0. >> >> >> >> >> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of >> >> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi >> >> >> Specification[1]. >> >> >> >> >> >> The staging area can be found at: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi >> >> >> >> >> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> >> >> >> >> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Eoghan >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] See RFC 119 in >> >> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Daniel Kulp >> >> > dk...@apache.org >> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> > >> > -- >> > Daniel Kulp >> > dk...@apache.org >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
