On Thu August 27 2009 6:40:53 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > For reasons probably most comparable to acute masochism, I've gone and > implemented the oft-requested 'flat array' feature. > > In a commit coming presently, if you add flat='true' to a parameter or > member of array type, you won't get an extra level of element for the > array. You'll just get 'n' elements of the contents, named after the > array property. > > I can't call what I had to do for this pretty.
Question: in your opinion, is this something that should be pushed back into 2.2.x? Just want to ask before I merge it. :-) -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
