I don't think so. But I have to go downstairs and meet my wife to go collect daughters from an airport, so I can't expand on my reasoning for the next few hours. So you might want to hold off on blocking it until you see if you find me persuasive.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu August 27 2009 6:40:53 pm Benson Margulies wrote: >> For reasons probably most comparable to acute masochism, I've gone and >> implemented the oft-requested 'flat array' feature. >> >> In a commit coming presently, if you add flat='true' to a parameter or >> member of array type, you won't get an extra level of element for the >> array. You'll just get 'n' elements of the contents, named after the >> array property. >> >> I can't call what I had to do for this pretty. > > Question: in your opinion, is this something that should be pushed back into > 2.2.x? Just want to ask before I merge it. :-) > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >
