Is anyone out there willing to admit that they have a good understanding of either the existing jetty continuation code, the mock-based tests, or both?
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since we are getting close to having 2.3 ready to release, I'm kind of looking > at the various deps to see if there are updates we should grab or not. > Things like woodstox and abdera and such are pretty much no-brainers. > > The two main contention points are: > 1) Jetty from 6 to 7- Benson has started investigating this. This DOES > involve some code changes as the Jetty packages and stuff have changed. > Thus, the http-jetty transport would be incompatible with Jetty 6. However, > it would give us some potential new features such as support for continuations > on HTTPs. (I think) > > 2) Spring - should we use 3.0.0 instead of 2.5.6? I think the answer for > this is "go ahead". We've already have profiles to test this and the same > code seems to work OK with 2.5.6 and 3.0.0. Just want to double check with > folks though. > > I'd like to hear peoples thoughts on those. > > > -- > Daniel Kulp > [email protected] > http://dankulp.com/blog >
