On Friday 16 July 2010 5:35:37 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > Is anyone out there willing to admit that they have a good > understanding of either the existing jetty continuation code, the > mock-based tests, or both?
Yea. I was planning on looking at it today, but kind of ran out of time doing other things. :-( I really hate mocks. Dan > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since we are getting close to having 2.3 ready to release, I'm kind of > > looking at the various deps to see if there are updates we should grab > > or not. Things like woodstox and abdera and such are pretty much > > no-brainers. > > > > The two main contention points are: > > 1) Jetty from 6 to 7- Benson has started investigating this. This > > DOES involve some code changes as the Jetty packages and stuff have > > changed. Thus, the http-jetty transport would be incompatible with Jetty > > 6. However, it would give us some potential new features such as > > support for continuations on HTTPs. (I think) > > > > 2) Spring - should we use 3.0.0 instead of 2.5.6? I think the answer > > for this is "go ahead". We've already have profiles to test this and > > the same code seems to work OK with 2.5.6 and 3.0.0. Just want to > > double check with folks though. > > > > I'd like to hear peoples thoughts on those. > > > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] > > http://dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://dankulp.com/blog
