Yep, just wanted to point out CXF shouldn't redo what is already done ( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/cdi/BValInterceptor.java )
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/9/23 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> > Hi Romain > > On 22/09/13 17:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Hi Sergey, >> >> if using CDI it should be automatically done since BVal 1.1 supports it by >> default on CDI/EJB beans. I didn't check the JAXRS spec but it can be free >> in a EE context. >> >> I guess we may still have to do some work at the runtime level, > > According to the spec, a default javax.validation.**ValidationException > exception mapper must be provided, this is easy enough, but the spec > specifies that "If the exception was thrown while validating a method > return type, then it is mapped to a response with status code 500..." > - I'm not sure CDI can help with validating the response. > > So if the runtime has to learn how to validate a response then it will > probably have to learn how to work with Validation API :-). > > I'm also thinking it can be useful when the client proxies are used... > > Cheers, Sergey > > *Romain Manni-Bucau* >> *Twitter: @rmannibucau >> <https://twitter.com/**rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> >> >* >> *Blog: >> **http://rmannibucau.**wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*> >> <http://**rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> >> *LinkedIn: >> **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/**rmannibucau*<http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*> >> *Github: https://github.com/**rmannibucau*<https://github.com/rmannibucau*> >> >> >> >> 2013/9/22 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]> >> >> Hi >>> >>> On 22/09/13 07:47, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>>> >>>> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/****jax-rs.html<http://cxf.apache.org/docs/**jax-rs.html> >>>> <http://cxf.apache.**org/docs/jax-rs.html<http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs.html> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> The intro gives some points >>>> >>>> >>> The documentation on the 2.0 support is poor at the moment, I'm finishing >>> with having the client API tested against the early TCK and will proceed >>> to >>> working on the docs shortly afterwards. >>> >>> Core 2.0 is now completely supported on the trunk. The only bit which is >>> still missing is Bean Validation which is an optional feature, we'll be >>> wiring it in too >>> >>> Sergey >>> >>> >>> Le 22 sept. 2013 01:29, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a >>> >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>> Putting together some information on Apache and Java EE 7 for JavaOne >>>> >>>>> next >>>>> week. >>>>> >>>>> There any information on JAX-RS 2.0 status? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Sergey Beryozkin >>> >>> Talend Community Coders >>> http://coders.talend.com/ >>> >>> Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com >>> >>> >> >
