On 23/09/13 12:24, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Yep,
just wanted to point out CXF shouldn't redo what is already done (
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/cdi/BValInterceptor.java
)
The less we'll have to do the better :-). Thanks for the link. Sure, the
actual validation code will need to be reused...
Cheers, Sergey
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/9/23 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
Hi Romain
On 22/09/13 17:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Sergey,
if using CDI it should be automatically done since BVal 1.1 supports it by
default on CDI/EJB beans. I didn't check the JAXRS spec but it can be free
in a EE context.
I guess we may still have to do some work at the runtime level,
According to the spec, a default javax.validation.**ValidationException
exception mapper must be provided, this is easy enough, but the spec
specifies that "If the exception was thrown while validating a method
return type, then it is mapped to a response with status code 500..."
- I'm not sure CDI can help with validating the response.
So if the runtime has to learn how to validate a response then it will
probably have to learn how to work with Validation API :-).
I'm also thinking it can be useful when the client proxies are used...
Cheers, Sergey
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
<https://twitter.com/**rmannibucau<https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
*
*Blog:
**http://rmannibucau.**wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*>
<http://**rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>>
*LinkedIn:
**http://fr.linkedin.com/in/**rmannibucau*<http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*>
*Github: https://github.com/**rmannibucau*<https://github.com/rmannibucau*>
2013/9/22 Sergey Beryozkin <[email protected]>
Hi
On 22/09/13 07:47, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi
http://cxf.apache.org/docs/****jax-rs.html<http://cxf.apache.org/docs/**jax-rs.html>
<http://cxf.apache.**org/docs/jax-rs.html<http://cxf.apache.org/docs/jax-rs.html>
The intro gives some points
The documentation on the 2.0 support is poor at the moment, I'm finishing
with having the client API tested against the early TCK and will proceed
to
working on the docs shortly afterwards.
Core 2.0 is now completely supported on the trunk. The only bit which is
still missing is Bean Validation which is an optional feature, we'll be
wiring it in too
Sergey
Le 22 sept. 2013 01:29, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a
écrit :
Putting together some information on Apache and Java EE 7 for JavaOne
next
week.
There any information on JAX-RS 2.0 status?
-David
--
Sergey Beryozkin
Talend Community Coders
http://coders.talend.com/
Blog: http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com
