Hi Andriy, Colm,

The MicroProfile Rest Client 2.0 GA release is currently in staging.  We
are working through a new process now that MP is formally an Eclipse
Working Group.  Part of that process is a two-week staging period where
steering committee members review and (hopefully) approve the staged
specification projects.  For Rest Client, we're about one week into that
process.  Given that many folks will be out next week due to the holidays,
I don't expect that Rest Client 2.0 will be officially released until early
January.  Once it is officially released, I plan to update the
parent/pom.xml file to point to the released API instead of the RC.  The
API is effectively the same as the RC - iirc, the only changes between the
last RC and the final (staged) release were changes to test cases in the
TCK.

If you want to release before the end of the year, I would not suggest
waiting for MP Rest Client 2.0 GA.  We can get it into the 3.4.3.

Hope this helps,

Andy

On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 12:25 PM Andriy Redko <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Colm,
>
> +1 in general, a few comments.
>
> The code for CXF-8340 is in, all builds are green, the only leftovers are
> to finalize the documentation and probably samples for JAX-RS / JAX-WS, I
> am on track to finish that over the weekend. Another good to have thing is
> to update to MP Rest Client API 2.0, it is already out [1] but I don't see
> it published to Maven repos yet. @Andy could you please clarify on the
> timelines?
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1] https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-rest-client/releases/tag/2.0
>
> Friday, December 18, 2020, 2:02:25 AM, you wrote:
>
> COh> Hi all,
>
> COh> I'd like to get CXF 3.4.2 out before the end of the year if possible.
> It's
> COh> a bit shorter than our usual release cycle, but there have been some
> COh> regressions which we should get released.
>
> COh> WSS4J 2.3.1 is under vote and should be released by Monday. Apart from
> COh> that, the only outstanding issue is the Graal stuff (CXF-8340).
> @Andriy
> COh> Redko <[email protected]> is there much more to do on this? Anything
> else
> COh> anyone is going to imminently fix for 3.4.2?
>
> COh> Colm.
>
>

Reply via email to