Hi - I see - I have added the rest of the Initial Committers to the PPMC.
Regards, Dave > On Oct 2, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Steve Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe ICLA's are signed and accounts are set up for all of our > Initial Committers. We're still working on getting SGA's from Tresys, > NCSA, and IBM. We're also inspecting the Daffodil codebase for other > contributors to determine if we need SGAs from other entities (AFRL, NRL > and DoD). We suspect their code has all been replaced, but we are still > verifying that. > > - Steve > > On 10/02/2017 03:04 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> >> It would be great to get ICLAs and accounts setup for more of the Initial >> Committers than you two. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 12:03 PM, Steve Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/29/2017 10:16 AM, Mike Beckerle wrote: >>>> Below is rough draft of our podling report. Comments/changes? >>>> >>>> ----------------- >>>> >>>> Daffodil >>>> >>>> Apache Daffodil is an implementation of the Data Format Description >>>> Language >>>> (DFDL) used to convert between fixed format data and XML/JSON. >>>> >>>> Daffodil has been incubating since 2017-08-27. >>>> >>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >>>> >>>> 1. obtaining SGAs >>>> 2. establishing new apache-centric infrastructure >>>> 3. broadening base of contributors >>>> >>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >>>> aware of? >>>> >>>> - Only that chasing the SGAs down is going to take some time, though >>>> this may be typical. >>>> >>>> How has the community developed since the last report? >>>> >>>> - Users: >>>> (1) The Open Grid Forum's DFDL workgroup mailing list has had inquiries >>>> and questions about Daffodil - using it and creating DFDL schemas. >>>> We will start redirecting such to our incubator users mailing list, >>>> as soon as we're ready. >>>> (2) A large software company has demonstrated a prototype integration of >>>> Daffodil into their commercial product. Of note: they did this without >>>> any support contact to Daffodil developers. >>>> >>>> - Developers/Contributors: One new outside developer has been setup, and >>>> has >>>> started a project modifying the Daffodil code-base. This is still in the >>>> pre-Apache >>>> context, and we've no idea if they'll want to contribute back. But it does >>>> show >>>> both interest and that the technical barriers to entry for new developers >>>> to be >>>> productive are surmountable. >>>> >>>> How has the project developed since the last report? >>>> >>>> - A final consistent release/build of the legacy (pre-Apache) code-base >>>> is over, all project efforts going forward can be Apache focused >>>> once we have infrastructure setup. >>>> - Progress is being made on obtaining the individual and organizational >>>> SGAs. >>>> >>>> How would you assess the podling's maturity? >>>> Please feel free to add your own commentary. >>>> >>>> [X] Initial setup >>>> [ ] Working towards first release >>>> [ ] Community building >>>> [ ] Nearing graduation >>>> [ ] Other: >>>> >>>> Date of last release: >>>> >>>> (none yet) XXXX-XX-XX >>>> >>>> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected? >>>> >>>> - No changes yet - same as at our project incubator inception >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: >>>> >>>> [ ](daffodil) John D. Ament >>>> Comments: >>>> [ ](daffodil) David Fisher >>>> Comments: >>>> >>>> IPMC/Shepherd notes: >>>> >>> >>> Looks good to me, +1 >>> >>> - Steve >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
