Steve Lawrence created DAFFODIL-1954:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Java version greater than 1.8 cause failure
                 Key: DAFFODIL-1954
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1954
             Project: Daffodil
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Back End
            Reporter: Steve Lawrence
             Fix For: 2.2.0


If you try to use Daffodil with Java 10, you get a failure with the exception:
{code}
java.lang.NumberFormatException: Not a version: 10
        at scala.util.PropertiesTrait$class.parts$1(Properties.scala:184)
        at scala.util.PropertiesTrait$class.isJavaAtLeast(Properties.scala:188)
        at scala.util.Properties$.isJavaAtLeast(Properties.scala:17)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.util.CheckJavaVersion$.checkJavaVersion(CheckJavaVersion.scala:29)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory$$anonfun$onPath$1.apply(Compiler.scala:166)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory$$anonfun$onPath$1.apply(Compiler.scala:149)
        at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:58)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.ExecutionMode$$anonfun$usingCompilerMode$1.apply(ExecutionMode.scala:64)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.ExecutionMode$$anonfun$usingCompilerMode$1.apply(ExecutionMode.scala:64)
        at 
org.apache.daffodil.compiler.ProcessorFactory.onPath(Compiler.scala:149)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main$$anonfun$71.apply(Main.scala:714)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main$$anonfun$71.apply(Main.scala:711)
        at org.apache.daffodil.util.Timer$.getTimeResult(Timer.scala:76)
        at org.apache.daffodil.util.Timer$.getResult(Timer.scala:35)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.createProcessorFromSchema(Main.scala:711)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.run(Main.scala:824)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main$.main(Main.scala:1297)
        at org.apache.daffodil.Main.main(Main.scala)
{code}
It looks like Java changed their version schema to not use a dot (e.g. 10 vs 
1.10) and Scala 2.11's checker could handle that, so a NumberFormatException is 
thrown.

It looks like scala 2.12 has better checking for this (see DAFFODIL-1652), but 
we should also catch a NumberFormatException here and treat that as if it is 
not a valid Java version.

This was reported on Java 10, but I suspect the same issues happens for Java 9. 
Also, we should run our tests on Java 9/10 to ensure tests still pass with a 
newer Java.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to