Thanks for both your responses :-)
As we are building with Java and Maven, I'll probably stick more to the maven
defaults and project setup.
I bet there is a way to run all of these tests in Maven surefire. Has this been
done before?
Chris
Am 17.01.19, 16:03 schrieb "Steve Lawrence" <slawre...@apache.org>:
To add on to that, the following can be used to generate a new dfdl
project layout using a template:
sbt new stevedlawrence/dfdl-project-layout.g8
It asks a couple questions about your format, then generates a project
with skeleton files for the schema, TDML file, and scala test file. You
can then run:
sbt test
to run the tests defined in the scala/tdml file. Information about the
TDML format is at:
https://daffodil.apache.org/tdml
- Steve
On 1/17/19 9:44 AM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
> Very nice schema Christofer.
>
>
> I recommend adding tests in TDML so as to exercise these in your ordinary
unit test/regression using Daffodil.
>
>
> This article:
>
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/dfdl-layout/
>
>
> explains the way we do this for sbt. Minor adaptations needed for maven
I'm sure.
>
>
> ...mike beckerle
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:21:51 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: First success with modeling the message formats for the Siemens
S7 Protocol with Daffodil
>
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to report that after finishing a first version of my S7
dfdl, I pretty quickly finished the 2 underlying protocols too.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-plc4x/tree/develop/src/main/dfdl
>
> Next I will probably start with using daffodil for parsing/serializing
test-data for easy human inspection
> (the XML or JSON files will be a lot easier to maintain as the PCAPNG
files).
>
> Maybe I’ll even whip up a version of the S7 protocol based entirely on
daffodil so we can do a performance measurement.
> However I expect to require more CPU time and memory using this path …
>
> As soon as I’m a little more familiar with it, I guess we could start the
discussion on some code-generation.
>
> Chris
>
>
