+1 I checked:
- incubating in name - hashes and signatures are correct - source, published jars, and binary helpers include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER - RAT check passes - no unexpected binaries in source - source has the same contents as release git tag (minus KEYS file) - source compiles and all tests pass (with both en_US and de_DE LANG) - daffodil jars in helper binaries are exactly the same as in repository - dependencies in helper binaries are exactly the same as in maven - jars compiled from source have the same content as jars in helper binaries/repo - rpm and msi install and run - ~30 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests - JavaDoc and ScalaDoc look correct On 4/9/20 1:05 PM, Olabusayo Kilo wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2. > > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be > found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.6.0-rc2/ > > Staging artifacts can be found at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1015 > > This release has been signed with PGP key 639637FDA8049411, > corresponding to olabus...@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS > file here: > > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS > > The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.6.0-rc2. > > For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.6.0: > > https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-2.6.0 > > For a summary of the changes in this release, see: > > https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.6.0/ > > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > (ends on Sunday, 12 April 2020, 12 Noon EST). > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
