On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Will do! Regarding the non-ASF package names, we discussed this quite > awhile back when we first entered incubation. If I recall the discussion > correctly, the consensus at that time was that it would be too burdensome > for users to update all their package references in their Pig scripts. I > don't think we've discussed the issue since then. What is the general > practice for migrating to the org.apache.* namespace?
I'm dealing with a few other podlings who are in a similar situation and it seems that the current consensus on general@ is that the change needs to occur unless there's a big reason for it not to. Now, in DataFu's case it is a little bit easier to argue that there are no corporate branding implications wrt. the old package names, but I think we still need to clarify that on general@ Would you mind starting a discussion? My goal here is to make sure you guys graduate sometime soon ;-) Thanks, Roman.
