Sure I will go ahead and do that. -Matt
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Matthew Hayes > <matthew.terence.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Will do! Regarding the non-ASF package names, we discussed this quite > > awhile back when we first entered incubation. If I recall the discussion > > correctly, the consensus at that time was that it would be too burdensome > > for users to update all their package references in their Pig scripts. I > > don't think we've discussed the issue since then. What is the general > > practice for migrating to the org.apache.* namespace? > > I'm dealing with a few other podlings who are in a similar situation > and it seems > that the current consensus on general@ is that the change needs to occur > unless there's a big reason for it not to. Now, in DataFu's case it is a > little > bit easier to argue that there are no corporate branding implications wrt. > the old package names, but I think we still need to clarify that on > general@ > > Would you mind starting a discussion? My goal here is to make sure you guys > graduate sometime soon ;-) > > Thanks, > Roman. >
