I downloaded the tarball, verified the checksum, ran the release
verification script from the downloaded source, and saw the following test
failure:

External error: 1 errors in file
/tmp/datafusion-49.0.1.RnL9I/apache-datafusion-49.0.1/datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/joins.slt

1. query result mismatch:
[SQL] SELECT t1_id, t1_name, t2_name FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2 ORDER BY t1_id
[Diff] (-expected|+actual)
-   11 a z
-   11 a y
    11 a x
    11 a w
+   11 a z
+   11 a y
+   22 b x
+   22 b w
    22 b z
    22 b y
-   22 b x
-   22 b w
+   33 c x
+   33 c w
    33 c z
    33 c y
-   33 c x
-   33 c w
-   44 d z
-   44 d y
    44 d x
-   44 d w
+   44 d w
+   44 d z
+   44 d y
at
/tmp/datafusion-49.0.1.RnL9I/apache-datafusion-49.0.1/datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/joins.slt:727


On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 8:28 AM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache DataFusion version 49.0.1.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> d1a6e9a6558300115d913a54bbea27e141156606 [1]
> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
> The changelog is located at [3].
>
> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, and
> vote
> on the release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the community
> are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> The standard verification procedure is documented at
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verifying-release-candidates
> .
>
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache DataFusion 49.0.1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache DataFusion 49.0.1 because...
>
> Here is my vote:
>
> +1
>
> [1]:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/tree/d1a6e9a6558300115d913a54bbea27e141156606
> [2]:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datafusion/apache-datafusion-49.0.1-rc1
> [3]:
>
> https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/d1a6e9a6558300115d913a54bbea27e141156606/CHANGELOG.md
>

Reply via email to