Someone else fixed the build and here's the page:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/datasketches.html

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:30 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Jenkins process that builds the status pages is unhealthy at the
> moment due to some bad data. I've created the template page nonetheless and
> filled in the bare bones:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/datasketches.xml
>
> Kenn
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That's a step for a mentor to do. Still needs doing. I'm pretty busy
>> today so anyone else could do it that would be great.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019, 10:51 Alexander Saydakov
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> What about this question?
>>>
>>> > 4) The DataSketches link
>>> <https://incubator.apache.org/projects/datasketches.html> is broken on
>>> the
>>> Apache Incubator page.  What do we need to get that set up?
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:55 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The proposal makes sense to me, with the one caveat that I wouldn't
>>> use a
>>> > separate repo for the generated website. The tradition is to use the
>>> > asf-site branch, while the master branch could contain the source for
>>> the
>>> > site. This just removes a little bit of cruft from the listing of top
>>> level
>>> > repositories. It is analogous to gh-pages branch for GitHub Pages.
>>> >
>>> > Requirements for the site are here:
>>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html
>>> >
>>> > Docs on the automated publishing here:
>>> > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html
>>> >
>>> > Requests for repositories go through here: https://gitbox.apache.org/
>>> >
>>> > Kenn
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 1:56 PM leerho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> OK, I just figured out that I could add Jon, Justin and Edo myself. :)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 1:14 PM leerho <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Jon, Alex and I had a planning meeting this morning to come up with a
>>> >>> proposal on what repositories we will need to get started. We also
>>> have
>>> >>> some questions that we will need some clarification on.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The overarching strategy is that we want to separate code that is
>>> >>> subject to different build/release schedules and/or different
>>> distribution
>>> >>> mechanisms.  This is to simplify our maintenance issues as well as
>>> simplify
>>> >>> user access and ability to get started quickly.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1) we propose the following repos:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches*:  We propose that this would be
>>> >>>    the website source where the README would include a list of links
>>> to the
>>> >>>    specific repos below.
>>> >>>    What changes to our current
>>> >>>    https://github.com/DataSketches/DataSketches.github.io website
>>> >>>    source will be required to comply with ASF's website generation
>>> process?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>    This will determine whether we can move this site at the beginning
>>> >>>    or wait until later.  This is not versioned and no artifacts are
>>> generated.
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-site: *This would be the website
>>> >>>    binary generated by some ASF tool and subject to the comment
>>> above.
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-java: *What we currently have in
>>> >>>    https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-core.  It is versioned
>>> with
>>> >>>    an artifact to Maven Central
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-cpp: *What we currently have in
>>> >>>    https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-core-cpp It has an
>>> GitHub
>>> >>>    version tag with release notes.
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-postgresql: What we currently
>>> have
>>> >>>    in https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-postgres
>>> >>>    <https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-postgres>.* Adaptor for
>>> >>>    PostgreSQL. It has an GitHub version tag with release notes, and
>>> a script
>>> >>>    for generating an artifact
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-hive: What we currently have
>>> >>>    in https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-hive
>>> >>>    <https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-hive>.* Adaptors for
>>> Hive. It
>>> >>>    is versioned with an artifact to Maven Central
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-pig: What we currently have
>>> >>>    in https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-pig
>>> >>>    <https://github.com/DataSketches/sketches-pig>. *Adaptors for
>>> Pig.  It
>>> >>>    is versioned with an artifact to Maven Central.
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-memory: What we currently have
>>> >>>    in https://github.com/DataSketches/memory
>>> >>>    <https://github.com/DataSketches/memory>. *DataSketches-java, pig
>>> >>>    and hive depend on this and other systems outside of DataSketches
>>> also
>>> >>>    depend on this. This has virtually no external run-time
>>> dependencies and
>>> >>>    would be ported first. It is versioned with an artifact to Maven
>>> >>>    Central.
>>> >>>    - *apache/incubator-datasketches-characterization:* This would be
>>> a
>>> >>>    merge of our https://github.com/DataSketches/characterization and
>>> >>>    https://github.com/DataSketches/characterization-cpp sites.
>>> This is
>>> >>>    not versioned and no artifacts are generated.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2) The remaining repos currently in https://github.com/DataSketches
>>> organization
>>> >>> are not critical and we can defer to later. They might either be
>>> obsoleted
>>> >>> or deleted.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 3) Any comments on the above proposal?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 4) The DataSketches link
>>> >>> <https://incubator.apache.org/projects/datasketches.html> is broken
>>> on
>>> >>> the Apache Incubator page.  What do we need to get that set up?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 5) Both *Jon Malkin* and *Edo Liberty* have signed and submitted
>>> their
>>> >>> ICLAs. Why are they not listed on
>>> >>> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/datasketches?  Both of them
>>> >>> should be part of the PPMC.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 6)* [email protected] <[email protected]>* should also be on the
>>> PPMC
>>> >>> list.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to