### Add support for Java 9 through 13 (inclusive), whilst retaining support
for Java 8.
### Add modularity support via Java Platform Module System for Java9+.
### Add support for user to provide memory request server implementation
for different resource types.
### Significant refactoring to better encapsulate internals and simplify
public facing API.
### Add documentation to explain project structure and configuration for
popular IDEs including Eclipse and IntelliJ.

Hello Apache DataSketches PMC and Community,

1. This is a call for vote to release Apache DataSketches-memory candidate
version:  2.0.0-RC1

    NOTE 1: This component of the DataSketches library provides
high-performance access to off-heap memory for Java applications. These are
low-level functions that are used by other DataSketches components. It does
not provide any command-line interface or GUI.

2. Source repository:
    - https://github.com/apache/datasketches-memory

    Git Tag for this release:
    - https://github.com/apache/datasketches-memory/tree/2.0.0-RC1 on
branch 2.0.X

    Git HashId for this release starts with: 86de062

3. The Release Candidate / Zip Repository:
    - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datasketches/memory/2.0.0-RC1/

    The public signing key can be found in the KEYS file:
    - https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/datasketches/KEYS

    The artifacts have been signed with --keyid-format SHORT : A21C4E36

4. Repository: Maven Central [Nexus](http://repository.apache.org) (Jar
Artifacts):
    -
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/datasketches/datasketches-memory/2.0.0/

5. Build & Test Guide:
    - https://github.com/apache/datasketches-memory/blob/2.0.0-RC1/README.md

6. The vote will be performed as follows:
   - This letter will be published on dev@ and remain open for at least 72
hours (excluding weekends and holidays), AND until at least 3 (+1) PMC
votes or a majority of (+1) PMC votes are acquired. Anyone in the community
can vote.

Please vote accordingly:

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Thanks,
David Cromberge
[email protected]

Reply via email to