Yes should mainly be a bugfix release with only a few new features.

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]> 
>Cc: deltaspike <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013, 13:07
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
> 
>
>
>Mark,
>
>
>A little aggressive based on how long it took to get 0.4?  Should this be a 
>small release then?
>
>
>I'd like to add some level of BeanValidation support in this release, looks 
>like the CODI and Seam features are pretty similar; so adding support for a 
>ConstraintValidatorFactory that creates injectable references would be a good 
>one (I was about to kick off that email).
>
>
>John
>
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>Hi!
>>
>>It's time to go for planing ds-0.5.
>>I'd say the release should be pretty small this time. Mostly bug fixes and a 
>>few minor enhancements. And max 1 or 2 bigger bullet features.
>>The goal is to release ds-0.5 end of this month.
>>
>>A few things on the list as I remember so far:
>>
>>* Finish graduation and apply latest changes to our Docs.
>>* Servlet module. Please add JIRAs which feature you like to see in this 
>>module
>>
>>* Improve the JSF module. We still miss a few features from CODI and 
>>seam-faces
>> . improve ClientWindow handling
>> . improve the typesafe navigation
>> . add @ConfigurationScoped and @ViewAccessScoped
>>
>>
>>* Improve the configuration
>> . brainstorming about configuration 'categories' as requested a few times 
>>already
>> . ProjectStage and/or property specific configuration
>>
>>
>>This DISCUSS will be closed in 72h. New feature requests after that time will 
>>be handled in deltaspike-0.6 (unless they are blockers).
>>
>>The timeframe I would suggest:
>>
>>* Implement new features during 2013-06-12
>>* Bugfixing and documentation until 2013-06-19
>>* start with the release on 2013-06-23
>>
>>
>>Any objection, ideas, feedback?
>>
>>
>>txs and LieGrue,
>>strub
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to