RE Bean Validation, I agree and enthusiastically invite anyone who has an
itch to work on Bean Validation and CDI to come help out implementing BV
1.1 at Apache BVal :D

Matt


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Gerhard Petracek <[email protected]
> wrote:

> as mentioned earlier i'm not sure about the bv parts (just for injection).
> therefore you just need to enable any bv 1.1 implementation (via
> default-provider) and you get even more.
>
> @thomas:
> the only missing parts besides that are the remaining scopes (the rest is
> in already).
>
> imo it's way more important to finish [1].
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-335
>
>
>
> 2013/6/1 Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]>
>
> > the most important feature are propably:
> > - finish the extended JSF scopes
> > - type view navigation
> > - injection BV artifacts
> >
> > so the most users could switch from CODI to DS. We currently do not use
> > more features in the most apps.
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/1 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> >
> > > Cdi query stuff would be great too
> > > Le 1 juin 2013 13:12, "Mark Struberg" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Yes should mainly be a bugfix release with only a few new features.
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >________________________________
> > > > > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]>
> > > > >To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> > > > >Cc: deltaspike <[email protected]>
> > > > >Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013, 13:07
> > > > >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Mark,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >A little aggressive based on how long it took to get 0.4?  Should
> this
> > > be
> > > > a small release then?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >I'd like to add some level of BeanValidation support in this
> release,
> > > > looks like the CODI and Seam features are pretty similar; so adding
> > > support
> > > > for a ConstraintValidatorFactory that creates injectable references
> > would
> > > > be a good one (I was about to kick off that email).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >John
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >Hi!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>It's time to go for planing ds-0.5.
> > > > >>I'd say the release should be pretty small this time. Mostly bug
> > fixes
> > > > and a few minor enhancements. And max 1 or 2 bigger bullet features.
> > > > >>The goal is to release ds-0.5 end of this month.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>A few things on the list as I remember so far:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>* Finish graduation and apply latest changes to our Docs.
> > > > >>* Servlet module. Please add JIRAs which feature you like to see in
> > > this
> > > > module
> > > > >>
> > > > >>* Improve the JSF module. We still miss a few features from CODI
> and
> > > > seam-faces
> > > > >> . improve ClientWindow handling
> > > > >> . improve the typesafe navigation
> > > > >> . add @ConfigurationScoped and @ViewAccessScoped
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>* Improve the configuration
> > > > >> . brainstorming about configuration 'categories' as requested a
> few
> > > > times already
> > > > >> . ProjectStage and/or property specific configuration
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>This DISCUSS will be closed in 72h. New feature requests after that
> > > time
> > > > will be handled in deltaspike-0.6 (unless they are blockers).
> > > > >>
> > > > >>The timeframe I would suggest:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>* Implement new features during 2013-06-12
> > > > >>* Bugfixing and documentation until 2013-06-19
> > > > >>* start with the release on 2013-06-23
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Any objection, ideas, feedback?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>txs and LieGrue,
> > > > >>strub
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to