gerhard/thomas The problem I have with "bv" is that no one refers to BeanValidation as bv (in fact, Bean Validation is the shortened form of JavaBeans Validation). Doing a quick google search on bv shows me some STDs. Since google is typically stalking me and knows I ask lots of programming questions, it would typically return the programming references first.
Doing a google search for "bv bean validation" shows beanvalidation.org, however there are no references to bv on that site. romain Yes, I think using "bval" ties us closely to the Apache impl. I think I generally prefer longer names. For example, we chose partial-bean rather than pb. If it were bean-val instead of beanval, would anyone mind that? John On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Gerhard Petracek < gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi john, > > in codi we used bv1 (like jpa1, jsf12, jsf20,...). > if we don't plan to support multiple versions with separated modules, i > tend to like just "bv" (since we use "jpa" and "jsf" for the modules of the > corresponding specs). > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2013/6/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > As a short name bval is fine but maybe too close of apache impl. So id > use > > bean-validation. Being explicit is good when naming things > > Le 16 juin 2013 15:25, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > One of the comments in the introduction of a Bean Validation module is > > that > > > the name I gave it isn't descriptive/useful. I chose the name > "beanval" > > > since it was a shortened version of "Bean Validation" that could easily > > be > > > read via maven. To me, it's descriptive of being related to JSR303 > > > support. > > > > > > One of the other names proposed is "bv." > > > > > > If anyone has any recommended names, or questions about the given > names, > > > could you speak up? > > > > > > John > > > > > >
